Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Disenfranchising the CIA not such a great idea


Those that know best in the B.O. administration have decided it would be a good idea to persecute members of the CIA who interrogate terrorists. Eric Holder most specifically, but don't fool yourself, it goes all the way to the top, the "second coming" himself. We have entrusted member of the military, defense, CIA and other agencies to protect us and keep us safe. There is a bond, a trust between our defenders and our government. It goes something like this, "we are going to send you in harms way, ask you to risk your life, and ask you to do horrible things that even if you survive, will haunt you every day for the rest of your lives. In return, we have your back." errr.... apparently, not so much. What happens when that trust is broken and those valiant men and women cannot trust the government? In the medical profession, it's called defensive medicine. Some doctors are so afraid of being sued for malpractice that they practice medicine defensively. Everything they do and every decision they make is based on not being sued, and covering their butt in a court room. As you can imagine, this is not the best way to practice medicine. Care is not always what it should be. Now the CIA is going to be asked to practice defensive defense. When collecting intelligence, their actions won't be guided by what is the best way to collect, it will be based on protecting their butts from Eric Holder and B.O.

This is just one more reason why the B.O. administration is not going to make it to a second term. He is stripping the powers from our intelligence collectors at a time when it's need most. He's making a crusade against other Americans, when he should be focusing on the enemy (just as he asked Americans to turn in other Americans for "fishy" emails that spoke out against B.O.Care.) All it is going to take is one significant terrorist attack that could have been prevented by the CIA interrogating terrorists, and B.O. and his people are finished in the next elections. Theoretically, anyway. We all know the Democrats can spin and twist words to the point that the average American -- especially their liberal puppy-dog followers -- will forget or become confused about what happened. We have all seen them do it before. No one blames Bill Clinton, for example, for stripping our HUMINT (Human Intelligence -- the operatives "on the ground." These are what you associate with the term "spy.") assets dry, which very well could have prevented 9/11 and the 2 war we are in now.

What are some of the things Holder will be going after? It is not even about torturing prisoners. It is about threatening to torture prisoners. It is about cocking the pistol in front of them and pointing it to their head as if you are going to shoot them, even if you don't shoot them. It's about turning on the drill in front of them to scare them. OK, for one thing, if they threaten someone to get info, and get info without even harming them, I'm good with that. If they have to burn out someone's eyeballs and cut off their 'nads to get info, I'm good with that, too. It's as simple as this: These are bad people. These bad people have information. This information is about other bad people. These other bad people want to kill Americans and other innocent people. As far as I'm concerned, do what you have to do to protect us. But, I'm not in charge. What this says, to liberals like B.O. and Eric Holder, the lives of little children and other innocent people who would be killed in another terrorist attack are not worth the cost of properly torturing terrorists. Or, I guess even the threat of torture.

We are becoming a very weak minded people.

Probe of CIA Imperils Interagency Trust - Political News - FOXNews.com

Posted using ShareThis

No comments: