Friday, December 11, 2009

Cheap fun

I'm going to use a bad word here, in the eyes of many a shooter: Wal-mart. Yep, that's right. I was just in Wal-mart and found a great deal on a cheap piece of kit. They have a "Center-Point" Laser sight for $29.99. It's not the compact little laser sights, but the big honkers that laser-light was putting out 5 or so years ago. the nice thing, it includes a remote switch. This isn't anything I would put on something with sharp recoil like a .45. But, since it's not exactly compact, I think the best application would be to stick it on my Beretta Storm 9mm Carbine. It's perfect for tactical carbines. We'll see next time at the range how it stays sighted with a little bit of recoil.

Past experiences with Center-Point optics haven't been great. I wouldn't advice sticking one of their $49 tactical scopes on something like a 7.62 NATO rifle. The kick is a little much. The crosshairs started to vibrate after about 4 rounds. NOT good.

Semper Fi

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Happy Birthday, Marines!

Happy Birthday, Marine Corps!

To all that do not know this, the US Marine Corps was founded in a Tavern. Tun's Tavern to be exact. So go toss back a cool one in celebration of our beloved Corps!

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Top 9 most important military small arms cartridge calibers


I am absolutely positive that this list will be controversial and will be completely different from everyone else’s list. This is not a list of which round is better than the other, these cartridges are listed by historical importance, not combat effectiveness. Although in some cases combat effectiveness is why it was so important. Also, this list is based off of my pool of knowledge, and history as how I was taught it, which is out of an American textbook. I’m quite sure someone off in Switzerland, France or elsewhere has a cartridge or two that they would add to the list.


.223 (5.56 NATO) -- Love it or hate it, this is the standard issue infantry caliber of almost the entire free world. Then half of the rest use its Russian-developed knock off, the 5.45x39. I made this number one because it is in the forefront in the global war for freedom and democracy. This round is highly accurate and faster than my Uncle Jim at the Golden Corral Buffet. That’s fast.

7.62x39 -- A solid round with plenty of knock-down (though the FMJ is prone to over-penetration), this round is the standard issue to #1’s “rest of the world.” If your country is former communist, or a developing nation, you shoot this round. This round was the one used to promote Soviet-style diplomacy and the expansion of the Soviet empire for decades. Lauded by Kalash Fanboys everywhere.

.30-06 -- This is the round that saved the world from itself...twice. First in the bolt action 1903 Springfield during The Great War, then second in everyone’s favorite rifle, the M1 Garand in WWII.

.303 British -- I have to give this cartridge its dues. Even though it has never been popular outside of Britain and its empire...oh what an empire it was. This round furthered the British empire and fought on the side of freedom in two World Wars.

7.62x54R -- This one was a close one with #4. Maybe a tie. Like #3, and #4, has plenty of whoop ass to resolve any issues you might have with the enemy. One of the oldest cartridge still being used today by a standing military, this cartridge played a huge part in defeating the Nazis in WWII.

9mm Luger (9mm NATO) -- Once again, love it or hate it, this is the standard issue infantry sidearm caliber of...once again...almost the entire free world. It is such a popular round throughout the world it was used by both sides of WWII.

.308 Winchester (7.62 NATO) -- Ballistically similar to #3,#4 and #5, this round has been proving itself on battlefields throughout the world since it’s inception in the 1950s in battle rifles, but is especially popular in machine guns and sniper rifles. Only its newness prevents it from being ranked higher.

.45 ACP -- One of the all time best handgun calibers in terms of stopping power. This one made the list only in part due to the 1911 handgun it is most famous for, but mostly for its use in the Thompson Sub-Machine gun used primarily in WWII and Korea.

7.92x57 (8mm Mauser) -- I debated this one, is it so much an important round, as it is the rifle that is important? I decided to add it to the list at #9. It is the cartridge for the standard issue rifle of the Army that conquered almost all of Europe...twice. That makes it important.


Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Range time

I'm a little bummed, I'm missing my shooting time. I haven't gone in a couple of weeks and am having withdrawals. I've been hacking up a lung for a couple of weeks now, and since it's been pretty wet and cold, I figured I had better not go. I'm trying to get better since this coming weekend is the early deer season here in Wisconsin. Also, this weekend is the start of pheasant, so next week I'll be hitting that. mmmmm. Can't wait.

Fox News

There has been more and more talk from the Obama administration and other liberal commentators about the Fox News channel being a "wing of the Republican Party," and they've been talking about its lies and inaccuracies. I try to view stuff like this as objectively as possible, which isn't always easy. But whenever they talk on the subject, they almost always bring up O'Reilly, or Glenn Beck, or other conservative talk shows. They are not differentiating between the opinion shows, and the news shows. MSNBC and the other news channels have shows on like Chris Matthews with all of his inaccuracies, but why doesn't the left complain about those shows? I have always felt the other news channels were very unfair to Republicans, while easy on Democrats. And, I've always thought Fox News was pretty even handed to all (we're talking news shows, not opinion). According to a study done by the Pew Research Center, I was right. The report says:

... a study by the Pew Research Center showed that 40 percent of Fox News stories on Obama in the last six weeks of the campaign were negative. Similarly, 40 percent of Fox News' stories on Obama's Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain, were negative.

On CNN, by contrast, there was a 22-point disparity in the percentage of negative stories on Obama (39 percent) and McCain (61 percent). The disparity was even greater at MSNBC, according to Pew, where just 14 percent of Obama stories were negative, compared to a whopping 73 percent of McCain stories -- a spread of 59 points.

So there you have it. Here's the article:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/12/white-house-escalates-war-words-fox-news/

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Arrogance and the short memories of Europeans

OK, I'm ticked. I was reading the comments postings in response to a British piece criticizing B.O. being given the Nobel peace prize. I'm DEFINITELY not ticked about the piece, but about some of the comments. The last comment, coming from a Norwegian I suspect, since not a lot of Americans and non-elfs have the name Olef, said (in part):

"As much as admire the man and what he appears to stand for, Obama is still the president of one of the most aggressive martial nation on the planet, which to date has refused to sign the Ottawa Mine Ban Treaty, which aims to eradicate a scourge, which has maimed and killed millions of innocent children, a terror which is still ongoing every day. This treaty has been ratified by 133 countries, but the US has to date refused to do so.

The intention of closing down the most hideous and unlawful institution devised by a western nation since WWII, the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, is laudable, but has yet to be accomplished....

...If you want to name heads of governments in the cause of peace, France’s Jacques Chirac, and Germany’s Schroeder would be more deserving, for not joining in the Iraq adventure, but most of all Canada’s Jean Chretien, who must have been under enormous pressure from a nation, which then counted for 87% of Canada’s foreign trade."

There are TONS of things I could respond with on this, I could get into the whole, "the US saved European butts more than once, and blah, blah, blah," but I'm not going to do that. The one thing that I haven't head anyone bring up yet, on this subject of the US and allies going into Iraq and Afghanistan is:

If Europeans hadn't felt the desire to colonize everyone and everywhere they could get their grubby little mitts on, and subsequently leave those areas in such states of utter chaos, the US wouldn't have to get involved in those areas. Look at the two areas primarily under European oppression: Africa and the Middle East. Look at the conditions those areas have been in since the Europeans conquered them, then left. The poverty, the fighting, the identity conflicts, I could go on and an about the problems of those areas, but the bottom line is that those problems arose because of European intervention and arrogance. European greed and the need to oppress free people left those areas the way they are.

So perhaps instead of criticizing the "evil US," Europeans like Olef should be thanking us for once again trying to fix the problems that Europe has perpetrated on the world.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Obama the Nobel Peace Prize recipient

Another great commentary from a Brit about B.O. I'm not surprised at him being given (not earned or awarded, but given) the Nobel, look at some of the recent winners; primarily Al Gore for his movie about global warming. What a sham. Some of the comments made by readers are great also. "Nobel: from leftists, to leftists for being leftist". Also, "like giving a Harvard degree to a 5 year old on his 12th day of kindergarden."

Here is the link:

Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize - Times Online

Shared via AddThis